+¤É ¨ÉèÆ +{ÉxÉä SÉÖxÉÉ´É IÉäjÉ Eòä ¤ÉÉ®úä ¨ÉäÆ EòÖUô Eò½þxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉÉ ½þÚÆ* ¨ÉèÆ ÊVÉºÉ ¶É½þ®ú ºÉä +ÉiÉÉ ½þÚÆ, =ºÉEòä +ÉvÉä ªÉÉjÉÒ =ºÉ ¶É½þ®ú ºÉä +ÉiÉä ½þèÆ*
¸ÉÒ |ɨÉÉänù ¨É½þÉVÉxÉ VÉÉ®úÒ +É{É VÉÉä BEò Eò®úÉäc÷ nùºÉ ±ÉÉJÉ Eò½þiÉä ½þèÆ =ºÉ¨ÉäÆ ºÉä 55 ±ÉÉJÉ ±ÉÉäMÉ ®úÉäVÉ ªÉÉjÉÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ* ªÉä +ÊxÉSUôÉ ºÉä ªÉÉjÉÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ* +É{É ºÉÉäÊSÉB ªÉä ±ÉÉäMÉ ªÉÉjÉÉ Eò®úEòä nùä¶É EòÉä Eò¨ÉÉ Eò®ú nùäiÉä ½þèÆ* <ºÉEòÉ ¨ÉiÉ±É¤É ½þè ªÉä nùÉä EòÉ¨É Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ, <xÉEòÉä ªÉÉjÉÉ Eò®úxÉä EòÒ <SUôÉ xɽþÒÆ ½þè, +ÊxÉSUôÉ ºÉä ®úä±É ¨ÉäÆ ¤Éè`öiÉä ½þèÆ +Éè®ú ®úä±É ¨ÉäÆ ¤Éè`ö Eò®ú nùä¶É EòÉä Eò¨ÉÉ Eò®ú nùäiÉä ½þèÆ* +¤É <xÉEòä |ÉÊiÉ +MÉ®ú nùäJÉxÉÉ ½þè iÉÉä ¨ÉèÆ Eòä´É±É <iÉxÉÉ Eò½þÚÆMÉÉ, ¨ÉèÆ +É{ÉEòÒ ¨ÉVɤÉÚ®úÒ VÉÉxÉiÉÉ ½þÚÆ ±ÉäÊEòxÉ ¨Éä®úÉ ªÉ½þ Eò½þxÉÉ ½þè ÊEò +É{É EòÖUô iÉÉä ºÉÖÊ´ÉvÉÉ nùÉä +Éè®ú +MÉ®ú ºÉÖÊ´ÉvÉÉ xÉ ¦ÉÒ nùÉä iÉÉä +{ÉxÉä ®úä±É Eòä +vªÉIÉ EòÉä ªÉ½þ Eò½þÉä ÊEò ºÉÖÊ´ÉvÉÉ xɽþÒÆ nùäxÉÒ ½þè ±ÉäÊEòxÉ Eò¨É ºÉä Eò¨É =xÉEòÉä b÷ÉÆ]õÉä iÉÉä ¨ÉiÉ* VÉ¤É +¨ÉäÊxÉ]õÒºÉ {É®ú {ÉÚUôÉ iÉÉä ®úä±É´Éä Eòä +vªÉIÉ xÉä Eò½þÉ -
"Give me unlimited funds, I will give you unlimited amenities."
<ºÉEòä ʱÉB ¨Éä®úä +Énùä¶É SÉÉʽþB, ¨ÉèÆ ¦ÉÒ nùä nùÚÆ, ¤ÉSSÉÉ ¦ÉÒ nùä nùäMÉÉ* +xÉʱÉʨÉ]õäb÷ ¡òÆbºÉ nùäxÉä Eòä ¤ÉÉnù +xÉʱÉʨÉ]õäb÷ Eòä{ÉäʺÉ]õÒ nùäxÉÉ, <ºÉ¨ÉäÆ EòÉèxÉ ºÉÒ BäºÉÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þè* +¤É ¨ÉÖZÉä ªÉ½þ ±ÉMÉiÉÉ ½þè ¨ÉÖÆ¤É<Ç Eòä ®úä±É ªÉÉÊjɪÉÉäÆ EòÉä Eò¹]õ ªÉ½þ ½þè ÊEò VÉ¤É VÉÉxÉ´É®ú ¦ÉÒ ®úä±É ºÉä ºÉ¡ò®ú Eò®úiÉÉ ½þè +Éè®ú =ºÉEòÉ ÊxÉªÉ¨É ½þè, +MÉ®ú nùºÉ ¤Éè±É ±Éä VÉÉxÉä ½þèÆ iÉÉä BEò ´ÉèMÉxÉ ¨ÉäÆ ÊEòiÉxÉä ¤Éè`öäÆMÉä* +MÉ®ú =ºÉºÉä VªÉÉnùÉ ¤Éè±É ʤÉ`öÉB MÉB iÉÉä EòÉxÉÚxÉ ºÉä ®úä±É {É®ú ¨ÉÖEònù¨ÉÉ SÉ±É ºÉEòiÉÉ ½þè ÊEò <x½þÉäÆxÉä =ºÉ ´ÉèMÉxÉ ¨ÉäÆ VªÉÉnùÉ ¤Éè±É EªÉÉäÆ Ê¤É`öÉB* ¨ÉÖZÉä ±ÉMÉiÉÉ ½þè ÊEò VÉÉä VÉÉxÉ´É®úÉäÆ Eòä ʱÉB EòÉxÉÚxÉ ±ÉÉMÉÚ ½þè ´É½þ +MÉ®ú ¨ÉÖÆ¤É<Ç ¨ÉäÆ ¨ÉxÉÖ¹ªÉÉäÆ {É®ú ±ÉÉMÉÚ Eò®úxÉä EòÉ ºÉƺÉnù iÉªÉ Eò®úä ÊEò ´É½þ ¨ÉxÉÖ¹ªÉÉäÆ {É®ú ¦ÉÒ ±ÉÉMÉÚ ½þÉäMÉÉ +Éè®ú =ºÉÒ |ÉEòÉ®ú =xÉEòÒ ´ªÉ´ÉºlÉÉ ½þÉäMÉÒ iÉÉä ¨ÉÖZÉä ±ÉMÉiÉÉ ½þè ÊEò VªÉÉnùÉ +SUôÉ ½þÉäMÉÉ* <ºÉʱÉB ½þ¨É ¤ÉÉ®ú-¤ÉÉ®ú +ÉVÉ Eò½þ ®ú½þä ½þèÆ ÊEò <ºÉ {É®ú +±ÉMÉ ºÉä ºÉÉäSÉäÆ* <ºÉ {É®ú EòÉä<Ç vªÉÉxÉ xɽþÒÆ MɪÉÉ ½þè* ¨ÉèÆ <ºÉʱÉB xɽþÒÆ Eò½þ ®ú½þÉ ½þÚÆ ÊEò ¨ÉèÆ ´É½þÉÆ ºÉä SÉÖxÉ Eò®ú +ÉiÉÉ ½þèÆ, SÉÖxÉ Eò®ú +ÉxÉä EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ªÉÉ xÉÉ +ÉxÉä EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ iÉÉä ºÉÆªÉÉäMÉ EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þè*
... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)
SHRI NITISH KUMAR (BARH):
¸ÉÒ xÉÒiÉÒ¶É EòÖ¨ÉÉ®ú (¤ÉÉgø) : VÉÉxÉ´É®ú EòÉä ®úä±É {É®ú ¤Éè`öxÉä EòÒ Vɰü®úiÉ xɽþÒÆ ½þè*
SHRI PRAMOD MAHAJAN (MUMBAI NORTH EAST):
¸ÉÒ |ɨÉÉänù ¨É½þÉVÉxÉ (¨ÉÖ¨¤É<Ç -- =iiÉ®ú {ÉÚ´ÉÇ) : +ÆiÉ ¨ÉäÆ ¨ÉèÆ Eòä´É±É <iÉxÉÉ ½þÒ Eò½þxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉÉ ½þÚÆ ÊEò +É{ÉEòÉ ®úä±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ Eò±{ÉxÉÉ ¶ÉÚxªÉ ½þè* ®úɹ]Å xÉÒÊiÉ {É®ú ºlÉÉxÉ-ºlÉÉxÉ {É®ú ®úÉVÉxÉÒÊiÉ ½þÉ´ÉÒ ½þè* ®úɹ]Å´ÉÉnù Eòä ºlÉÉxÉ {É®ú IÉäjÉ´ÉÉnù ½þè* <ºÉ¨ÉäÆ º´ÉºlÉ ±ÉÉäEòʽþiÉ Eòä ºlÉÉxÉ {É®ú ºÉºiÉÉ ±ÉÉäEò®úÆVÉxÉ ½þè* ¨ÉèÆxÉä +É{ÉEòÉ ¦ÉɹÉhÉ 1 PÉÆ]õÉ 40 ʨÉxÉ]õ ºÉÖxÉÉ, =ºÉ¨ÉäÆ ºÉä nùºÉ ʨÉxÉ]õ Eòä´É±É +lÉǶÉɺjÉ lÉÉ* ¨ÉÖZÉä ºÉ¨ÉZÉ ¨ÉäÆ xɽþÒÆ +ÉiÉÉ, {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ VÉÒ, ¨ÉèÆ +É{ÉEòÉä nùÉä¹É xɽþÒÆ nùäiÉÉ* {ɽþ±Éä Eòä ®úä±É ¨ÉÆjÉÒ ¦ÉÒ ªÉ½þÒ Eò®úiÉä +ÉB ½þèÆ* ¨ÉÖZÉä +ÉVÉ iÉEò ºÉ¨ÉZÉ xɽþÒÆ +ɪÉÉ ÊEò EòÉä<Ç ®úä±É ¨ÉÆjÉÒ Ê½þxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ EòÒ <iÉxÉÒ ¤Éc÷Ò ºÉƺÉnù ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉɹÉhÉ Eò®úiÉä ºÉ¨ÉªÉ ªÉ½þ EªÉÉäÆ Eò½þiÉÉ ½þè ÊEò ¨ÉÖÆ¤É<Ç ºÉä SÉäxxÉ<Ç EòÉä nùÉä ¤ÉÉ®ú MÉÉc÷Ò UôÚ]õäMÉÒ* ºÉ{iÉɽþ ¨ÉäÆ iÉÒxÉ ¤ÉÉ®ú EòÒ VÉMɽþ SÉÉ®ú ¤ÉÉ®ú UôÚ]õäMÉÒ* ´É½þ ¤ÉÒSÉ ¨ÉäÆ Eò½þÉÆ °üEòäMÉÒ* ªÉ½þ ®úä±É´Éä EòÉ ]õÉ<¨É-]õä¤É±É ½þè* ¨ÉèÆxÉä ʺÉÊ´É±É BÊ´ÉB¶ÉxÉ Ê¨ÉÊxɺ]õ®ú EòÉ ¦ÉɹÉhÉ ºÉÖxÉÉ ÊEò +¦ÉÒ ½þ¨ÉxÉä MɨÉÒÇ Eòä EòÉ®úhÉ ¤Énù±É ÊnùªÉÉ ½þè* ¨ÉÖZÉä ±ÉMÉiÉÉ ½þè ÊEò
These are very minor details which should be left to a notification.
+É{É <iÉxÉä Ê´ÉYÉÉ{ÉxÉ nùäÆiÉä ½þÉä =ºÉ¨ÉäÆ BEò Ê´ÉYÉÉ{ÉxÉ +Éè®ú nùä nùÒÊVÉB*
... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)
SHRI RAM KRIPAL YADAV (PATNA):
¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É EÞò{ÉÉ±É ªÉÉnù´É ({É]õxÉÉ) : ¨É½þÉänùªÉ, ½þ´ÉÉ<ÇVɽþÉVÉ ºÉä ÊEòiÉxÉä |ÉÊiɶÉiÉ ±ÉÉäMÉ ªÉÉjÉÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ +Éè®ú ®úä±É ºÉä ÊEòiÉxÉä |ÉÊiɶÉxÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ* +¦ÉÒ +É{ÉxÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò ±ÉÉäEòʽþiÉ ¨ÉäÆ ªÉ½þ EòÉ¨É ÊEòªÉÉ VÉÉ ®ú½þÉ ½þè* ªÉ½þ ºÉ¤É ±ÉÉäMÉÉäÆ EòÒ ¨ÉÉÆMÉ ½þè*
... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)
={ÉÉvªÉIÉ ¨É½þÉänùªÉ : VÉ¤É +É{ÉEòÒ ]õxÉÇ +ÉBMÉÒ iÉÉä =ºÉ ºÉ¨ÉªÉ ¤ÉÉä±É ±ÉÒÊVÉB*
SHRI PRAMOD MAHAJAN (MUMBAI NORTH EAST):
¸ÉÒ |ɨÉÉänù ¨É½þÉVÉxÉ (¨ÉÖ¨¤É<Ç -- =iiÉ®ú {ÉÚ´ÉÇ) : ¨ÉèÆ <ºÉ ±ÉÉ±É ZÉÆb÷Ò EòÉä nùäJÉ Eò®ú +{ÉxÉÉ ¦ÉɹÉhÉ ®úÉäEòiÉä ½þÖB Eòä´É±É <iÉxÉÉ ½þÒ Eò½þxÉÉ SÉɽþÚÆMÉÉ ÊEò 1924 ¨ÉäÆ BE]õ¤ÉlÉÇ xÉä {ɽþ±ÉÒ ¤ÉÉ®ú ®úä±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ EòÉä VÉxÉ®ú±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ ºÉä +±ÉMÉ ÊEòªÉÉ* =x½þÉäÆxÉä ®úä±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ EòÉä VÉxÉ®ú±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ ºÉä <ºÉʱÉB +±ÉMÉ ÊEòªÉÉ ÊEò =ºÉ ºÉ¨ÉªÉ ®úä±É EòÉ nùÉʪÉi´É ʽþxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ Eòä +lÉǶÉɺjÉ ¨ÉäÆ ¤É½þÖiÉ ¤Éc÷É lÉÉ* +¤É ½þ¨É =ºÉEòä ¤ÉÉnù ±ÉMɦÉMÉ 60-65 ´É¹ÉÇ +ÉMÉä +ÉB ½þèÆ* ®úä±É EòÉ nùÉʪÉi´É ´É½þ xɽþÒÆ ¤ÉSÉÉ ½þè VÉÉä {ɽþ±Éä lÉÉ* +¤É +ÉìªÉ±É ½þè, ]õä±ÉÒ Eò¨ªÉÚÊxÉEòä¶ÉxÉ ½þè, BªÉ®ú ±ÉÉ<ÇxÉ ½þè +Éè®ú ¦ÉÒ ¤É½þÖiÉ ºÉÉ®úä IÉäjÉ ½þèÆ VÉÉä ®úä±É ºÉä {ÉÚÆVÉÒ ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÒ +ÉMÉä ¤Égøä ½þèÆ, =xÉEòÒ +ɴɶªÉEòiÉÉ ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÒ +ÉMÉä ¤Égøä ½þèÆ* +¤É +lÉÇEòÉ®úhÉ ¤Énù±ÉÉ ½þè* ®úɨÉʴɱÉÉºÉ VÉÒ, +É{É ¦ÉÒ ¤Énù±Éä ½þèÆ* +MÉ®ú +É{É +lÉÇEòÉ®úhÉ Eòä ºÉÉlÉ ¤Énù±ÉÉäMÉä, xɪÉÉ ºÉ{ÉxÉÉ, xɪÉÒ nÞùʹ]õ ±ÉäEò®ú ®úä±É ¨ÉÆjÉÉ±ÉªÉ +{ÉxÉÉ ¤ÉVÉ]õ xɽþÒÆ ¤ÉxÉÉBMÉÉ iÉÉä ®úä±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ +±ÉMÉ ½þÉäxÉä EòÒ +ɴɶªÉEòiÉÉ xɽþÒÆ ®ú½þäMÉÒ* ´É½þ |ÉÉºÉÆÊMÉEò ¦ÉÒ xɽþÒÆ ®ú½þäMÉÉ +Éè®ú MÉÆ¦ÉÒ®ú ¦ÉÒ xɽþÒÆ ®ú½þäMÉÉ* <ºÉ ®úä±É ¤ÉVÉ]õ EòÉä ¤ÉÆnù Eò®úxÉä EòÒ {É®ú¨{É®úÉ ¨ÉäÆ +É{É ªÉÉäMÉnùÉxÉ ¨ÉiÉ EòÊ®úB, <iÉxÉÒ ½þÒ ¨Éä®úÒ |ÉÉlÉÇxÉÉ ½þè* <ºÉEòä ºÉÉlÉ ½þÒ ºÉÉlÉ +É{ÉEòÉä ¤É½þÖiÉ-¤É½þÖiÉ vÉxªÉ´ÉÉnù*
(<ÊiÉ)
SHRI SRIBALLAV PANIGRAHI (DEOGARH): Mr. Deputy-Speaker, Sir, we have the Railway Budget presented here in this House on 26th February, 1997. Two days after, the General Budget, as usual, was presented on the last day of February. As Shri Pramod Mahajan was mentioning, a separate Budget on Railways was thought of 74 years ago in 1924. On the recommendation of the Actworth Committee, it was decided that Railway Accounts should be separated from the General Accounts. Accordingly, a provision for separate Railway Budget was made.
Even after the Independence, the Railways used to dominate not only in transport sector of our country but also playing a very dominant role in the entire economic scenario of the country. In 1950-51, the Railways accounted for 91 per cent freight movement of the total goods traffic. That was the position at the beginning of our Plan period. But what is the present position? Today, the Railways carry less than 40 per cent of the total goods traffic and 60 per cent of the goods traffic has gone to the road sector.
As regards passenger traffic, during 1950-51, 80 per cent of the total passengers were availing of Railway transport and the residue, that is about 20 per cent passengers were using road transport. Now the present position is just the reverse. About 80 per cent of the total passengers travel by road and the rest 20 per cent travel by train. The figure of 11 million passengers which the hon. Railway Minister referred to, comes to 20 per cent. This is the position.
Again Sir, what will happen by 2000 A.D... (Interruptions)
Sir, by 2000 A.D., i.e., by the turn of the century, according to the Economic Survey -- which was circulated a few days before -- the freight traffic by road which is now 60 per cent would go up to 65 per cent and 35 per cent would go to the rest.
Again, in respect of passenger traffic, 87 per cent will move by road transport and 13 per cent will move by rail. What sort of dominance Railways claim in our economy and in our transport sector?
I need not minimise the importance of Railways. There are certain welcome features in the functioning of Railways. Our Railways are the single largest public sector enterprise and the single largest employer in the country. It is the largest railway in the whole world. Ours is the only railway which runs on profit also. This is the only railway which also pays dividend to the general exchequer. These are positive things associated with our Railways.
There are certain other features which I welcome and I thank the Minister for that. Of course, we know that in Railways, there are some planners, economists and bureaucrats who always try to highlight or emphasise that Railways are losing their commercial character day by day, it should be totally commercial. At least, in India, we cannot look at Railways from that angle. India is a country with many languages. It is a vast country; it is a large country with many languages, many races, hilly areas and so many other things. Therefore, to maintain national integrity is the topmost important [5task of all of us. To strengthen that much called for integrity, Railways also have to play a very important role right from Jammu to Kanyakumari and from North-East to Kutch.
In this year's Budget speech, the Minister has asserted this time also that Railways cannot be merely a commercial concern; they have also to meet certain social obligations. We welcome this. As you know, the objective of our Plan is growth with social justice. We have to fight regionalism. In the North-East and Jammu and Kashmir, there was no railway earlier. Of course, in respect of Jammu and Kashmir, two years before, there was a programme to connect Kashmir portion by railways during the previous Government's tenure. This aspect is a very welcome feature.
So far as the budgetary support is concerned, hitherto it was dwindling. At one point of time, I think, during the Fifth Plan period, it was as high as 75 per cent. Last year, it came down from 75 per cent to 16 per cent. It cannot be denied that Railways come under the category of infrastructure. Railways are the best infrastructure in our country and it is a catalyst for the development of our country. Therefore, this budgetary support has got to be adequate. There should be adequate provision for Railways by way of budgetary support. It should not be reduced. This year, it has risen from 16 per cent to 21 per cent. This is a good thing. So far as the provision to North-East and Jammu and Kashmir is concerned, it is a welcome feature.
Thirty-seven surveys have been included in this year's Budget. Some eleven new trains are being introduced. There is some expansion or the frequency is being increased. These are something and it seems to be a compilation of the demands made by Members of different parties. Some demands were accepted, some were not accepted and some were partially accepted. On the whole, it seems to be a compilation of those demands.
For completion of the ongoing lines, we want a mind-boggling figure of Rs.20,000 crore, according to one estimate based on today's price index. In course of time, escalation will be there and this figure will also undergo upward revision. That way Rs.20,000 crore will be Rs.30,000 crore and Rs.40,000 crore. That is the problem. To meet the requirements of the other sectors of railways, another Rs.20,000 crore to Rs.30,000 crore will be necessary. If this is the position today, what is going to happen in the 21st century which we are fast approaching? This is the second Budget of this Government presented by Shri Ram Vilas Paswan. We are on the verge of 21st century. That way, it appears to be a very very ad hoc Budget. Perspective planning, future planning and National Plan are not reflected in this Budget. It is not a happy thing.
I said that there is five per cent increase in long-distance sleeper coach and ten per cent increase in AC First Class. I do not grudge that ten per cent increase in AC First Class. There is 12 per cent increase in freight rate. These are the highlights of this year's Budget.
As regards five per cent increase in sleeper class, I would like to say that even common people are required to undertake long and overnight journey and, that way, I do not think the hon. Minister's assertion that "I am not taxing the common man", is correct. Common men also do travel by train overnight. That way, common man is also affected.
There is 12 per cent increase in freight rate. Without any fear of contradiction, I would like to say that Indian railway freight now is the highest in the world. There is 23 per cent increase in the course of seven months. That way, this year is very much inflationary in nature. Everybody knows that it is a question of time when petroleum price hike will be there. Any day there will be upward revision of the prices of petroleum products. Coupled with this, there will be five per cent increase in charges of road transport sector in the General Budget.
THE MINISTER OF RAILWAYS (SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN): Fare is the same.
SHRI SRIBALLAV PANIGRAHI (DEOGARH): Freight rates will affect the economy. I think earlier also this point has been dealt with at length. That way, 3.2 per cent further increase will be there. The inflation rate was four per cent when you took over as Minister of Railways. Now when you are presenting this Budget, it is double that figure and it will move upward. I am sure we will be happy if it does not touch double digit figure. But we have every reason to be apprehensive that it will go beyond ten per cent. It will be 11 per cent or 12 per cent. That is the apprehension today. In spite of that, Railway Board has made a ridiculous claim -- last time also in July and again they have repeated this time after the presentation of this Budget -- that the effect will be minimal on the prices. I do not know how the Railway Board is coming to this conclusion. Let them not ridicule.
Let them say that this is their predicament and they have to increase the freight rate, fare rate etc. But why are they coming before the public with the ridiculous statement saying that it will have no effect, that it will have minimal effect and insignificant effect on our economy? Instead, this will have a cascading effect on our economy. The 12 per cent increase in freight rate at a stretch, another 10 per cent increase effected only seven or eight months back, the price hike in respect of the petroleum products which is in the offing and the five per cent increase in respect of other things, all will have a cascading effect on the economy. There is no doubt about it.
SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN (HAJIPUR):
®úä±É ¨ÉÆjÉÒ (¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ) : ½þ¨É SÉɽþiÉä ½þèÆ ÊEò VÉ´ÉÉ¤É ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÒ EòÖUô ºÉÖvÉÉ®ú Eò®úäÆ +MÉ®ú MɱÉiÉ ½þÉä* +É{ÉxÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò ºÉÉ®úÒ SÉÒVÉÉäÆ Eòä nùÉ¨É ¤Égø ®ú½þä ½þèÆ* {Éà]ÅÉäÊ±ÉªÉ¨É |ÉÉäb÷E]ºÉ Eòä nùÉ¨É ¦ÉÒ Ê{ÉUô±ÉÒ ¤ÉÉ®ú 20 |ÉÊiɶÉiÉ ¤Égøä ½þèÆ* +¦ÉÒ +É{É Eò½þ ®ú½þä ½þèÆ ÊEò ¦ÉʴɹªÉ ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÒ ¤ÉgøxÉä EòÒ ºÉƦÉÉ´ÉxÉÉ ½þè* +É{É VÉÉxÉiÉä ½þèÆ ÊEò ®úä±É´Éä ¨ÉäÆ 16 ±ÉÉJÉ Eò¨ÉÇSÉÉ®úÒ EòÉ¨É Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ +Éè®ú =ºÉEòä EòÉ®úhÉ {Éà]ÅÉäÊ±ÉªÉ¨É {ÉnùÉlÉÉäÇÆ EòÒ JÉ{ÉiÉ ¦ÉÒ VªÉÉnùÉ ºÉä VªÉÉnùÉ ®úä±É´Éä EòÉä ½þÒ ¦ÉÖMÉiÉxÉÒ {Éc÷iÉÒ ½þè* 3500 Eò®úÉäc÷ ¯û{ɪÉÉ ½þ¨ÉxÉä {ÉÉÆSÉ´Éä ´ÉäiÉxÉ +ɪÉÉäMÉ Eòä ʱÉB ®úJÉ ÊnùªÉÉ* =ºÉ {ÉÊ®úʺlÉÊiÉ ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÒ +É{ÉxÉä ªÉ½þ Eò½þÉ ÊEò ¨ÉxɨÉÉä½þxÉ ÊºÉÆ½þ VÉèºÉä <EòÉàxÉÉàʨɺ]õ xÉä Eò½þ ÊnùªÉÉ ÊEò ®úä±É´Éä EòÉä ¤ÉVÉ]õ®úÒ ºÉ{ÉÉä]õÇ xɽþÒÆ ʨɱÉxÉÉ SÉÉʽþB, =ºÉä +{ÉxÉä {Éè®úÉäÆ {É®ú JÉc÷É ½þÉäxÉÉ SÉÉʽþB* =ºÉ {ÉÊ®úʺlÉÊiÉ ¨ÉäÆ ªÉÊnù ®úä±É´Éä b÷à´É±É{ɨÉäÆ]õ EòÉ EòÉ¨É Eò®úä +Éè®ú +{ÉxÉä {Éè®úÉäÆ {É®ú JÉc÷Ò ¦ÉÒ ®ú½þä iÉÉä +MÉ®ú ½þ¨É 5 |ÉÊiɶÉiÉ º±ÉÒ{É®ú EòÉ ÊEò®úɪÉÉ ¤ÉgøÉiÉä ½þèÆ iÉÉä =ºÉEòÉ ¦ÉÒ Ê´É®úÉävÉ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þè* ¤ÉVÉ]õ ¨ÉäÆ +É{É 2000 Eò®úÉäc÷ ¯û{ɪÉÉ ªÉÉ 5000 Eò®úÉäc÷ ¯û{ɪÉÉ nùä nùäÆ iÉÉä ´É½þ xɪÉÒ ±ÉÉ<xÉÉäÆ {É®ú JÉSÉÇ ½þÉäMÉÉ, MÉäVÉ EòxɴɶÉÇxÉ {É®ú xɽþÒÆ ½þÉäMÉÉ* =ºÉEòÉä ½þ¨É xɪÉÒ ®úä±É´Éä ±ÉÉ<xÉÉäÆ {É®ú xÉÉàlÉÇ <Ǻ]õ ¨ÉäÆ JÉSÉÇ Eò®úäÆMÉä* ½þ¨É ¨ÉÉxÉxÉÒªÉ ºÉnùºªÉÉäÆ ºÉä VÉÉxÉxÉÉ SÉɽþäÆMÉä ÊEò ®úä±É´Éä b÷à´É±É{ɨÉäÆ]õ EòÉ EòÉ¨É Eò®úä +Éè®ú ºÉÖnùÚ®ú MÉÉÆ´ÉÉäÆ iÉEò ®úä±É´Éä ±ÉÉ<xÉÉäÆ EòÉä ¦ÉÒ ±Éä VÉÉB +Éè®ú +{ÉxÉä Ê®úºÉÉäºÉÇàWÉ ¦ÉÒ VÉxÉ®úä]õ Eò®úä, =ºÉEòä ʱÉB +É{ÉEòä ºÉÖZÉÉ´É EªÉÉ ½þèÆ?
SHRI SRIBALLAV PANIGRAHI (DEOGARH): I am grateful to the hon. Railway Minister. I wish that he has some little patience! I am not like any other hon. Member just criticising the Budget. I am explaining the real position, what it is like.
SHRI SYED MASUDAL HOSSAIN (MURSHIDABAD): You are criticising the other Members while saying: "I am not like other Members."
SHRI SRIBALLAV PANIGRAHI (DEOGARH): I am not criticising others. When your turn comes, you speak.
MR. DEPUTY-SPEAKER : Shri Sriballav Panigrahi, please address the Chair.
SHRI SRIBALLAV PANIGRAHI (DEOGARH): I said what it is like. I am analysing what is the present position and I want to say what should be done. Today, in the beginning itself, I have said that there are certain good features in the Budget. In the beginning, I have said that the railway is the main infrastructure, this is a catalyst for the development of the country and more and adequate budgetary support should be there. I have said this. I am on record. At the same time, I am on the point of what effect these increases will have on the economy. I was trying to say about that.
Sir, I know the predicaments of the hon. Minister. As far as the country is concerned, there are the challenging situations ahead of the Railway Minister. We have got to do much more in consultation with the different political parties. There should be good understanding among the various people. We have to involve the workers also. We have to ensure the participation of the workers in the management. It is not an individual task that the Minister is facing. But it is there ahead of us all in the days to come, in the 21st century. How can we address these problems? I have my own suggestions and I will make my suggestions now.
Over the last six or seven months, the health of the Railways, the economy of the Railways, instead of making improvement, is deteriorating. It is indicated through the operational cost ratio. As you know, the operational cost ratio is something like the working expenses of the Railways in relation to their total gross income. It stands today at 91 per cent. Seven months before, when Shri Ram Vilas Paswan became the Minister, it was at 86 per cent. So, over the last seven months, it has gone up by 5 per cent more. Why should I say that there is an ad hoc approach? I know his helplessness. He is helpless. But, at the same time, it has got to be analysed here.
Again, about the percentage of price hike, I am coming to that.
This Railway Budget will result in the rise in prices of coal by Rs.45 per tonne. One will have to pay eight paise more for one litre of HSD and nine paise per litre for petrol before the other hike takes place.
MR. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: Panigrahiji, you can continue next time.
={ÉÉvªÉIÉ ¨É½þÉänùªÉ : {ÉÉÊhÉOɽþÒ VÉÒ, |ÉÉ<´Éä]õ ¨É訤ɺÉÇ Ê¤É±É EòÉ ]õÉ<¨É ½þÉä MɪÉÉ ½þè, +É{É ¤ÉÉnù ¨ÉäÆ +{ÉxÉÉ ¦ÉɹÉhÉ VÉÉ®úÒ Eò®ú ºÉEòiÉä ½þèÆ*
SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN (HAJIPUR):
®úä±É ¨ÉÆjÉÒ (¸ÉÒ ®úÉ¨É Ê´É±ÉÉºÉ {ÉɺɴÉÉxÉ) : ={ÉÉvªÉIÉ ¨É½þÉänùªÉ, ºÉ´Éä®úä ÊVɺÉEòä ¤ÉÉ®úä ¨ÉäÆ ¨ÉÉxÉxÉÒªÉ ºÉnùºªÉÉäÆ xÉä ÊSÉÆiÉÉ ´ªÉEiÉ EòÒ ½þè =ºÉ {É®ú ¨ÉèÆ BEò ±ÉÉ<xÉ ¤ÉÉä±ÉxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉÉ ½þÚÆ ÊEò ºÉ¨ÉÉSÉÉ®ú {ÉjÉÉäÆ ¨ÉäÆ ®úÉVÉvÉÉxÉÒ BEºÉ|ÉäºÉ ¨ÉäÆ b÷EòèiÉÒ Eòä ºÉÆ¤ÉÆvÉ ¨ÉäÆ ºÉ¨ÉÉSÉÉ®ú |ÉEòÉʶÉiÉ ½þÖ+É ½þè, iÉÉä ¨ÉèÆ ªÉ½þ ¤ÉiÉÉxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉÉ ½þÚÆ ÊEò ´É½þ ¤ÉèºÉ±ÉèºÉ ½þè, ´É½þ ºÉ¨ÉÉSÉÉ®ú ºÉ½þÒ xɽþÒÆ ½þè*
SHRI V. DHANANJAYA KUMAR (MANGALORE):
¸ÉÒ ´ÉÒ. vÉxÉ\VÉªÉ EòÖ¨ÉÉ®ú (¨ÉÆMɱÉÉè®ú) : {É®úÆiÉÖ ªÉ½þ nùÚ®únù¶ÉÇxÉ {É®ú +ɪÉÉ ½þè*
... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)
SHRI RAM VILAS PASWAN (HAJIPUR):
[NEXT PAGE]